

Currently released so far... 5420 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Browse by tag
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE517, COSTA RICAN GOVERNMENT PRACTICES-INFORMATION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
VZCZCXYZ0007
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0517/01 1731843
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 221843Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0952
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000517
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT FOR S/CT Hillary Batjer Johnson and Paul Schultz; NCTC; DHS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KVPR PTER PREL PGOV CVIS ASEC KHLS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICAN GOVERNMENT PRACTICES-INFORMATION
COLLECTION, SCREENING AND SHARING
REF: STATE 322287
ΒΆ1. (SBU) As requested reftel, the following are Post's responses to
questions on Costa Rica's government practices on information
collection, screening and sharing. Responses, cleared by all
relevant Embassy sections, are keyed to reftel's questions:
5A. IMMIGRATION DATA BASES AND TRAVELER INFORMATION COLLECTION:
-- What computerized immigration databases are used to track entries
and exits? Costa Rican Immigration's (CRI) database is called POWER
BUILDER and is based on SYBASE. Their servers are from SUN
Microsystems and the operating system is SOLARIS (latest version).
CRI tracks all entries and exits by name, document number, departure
point and destination. However, the most reliable port of entry
where this occurs is Juan Santamaria international airport in San
Jose.
-- Is the computerized immigration database available at all ports
of entry (POEs)? Yes, but see above.
-- What problems, if any, limit the effectiveness of the systems?
For example, limited training, power brownouts, budgetary
restraints, corruption, etc.? Although entries/exits at the major
international airports are fairly well tracked, land and sea borders
are porous; many entries and exits there go undetected.
-- How often are national immigration databases updated? On an "as
needed" basis.
-- What are the country's policies (legislation, mandates, etc.) on
collecting information from travelers arriving in the country?
Costa Rica is a part of theComisisn Centroamericana de Directores de
Migracisn Central American Commission of Migration (OCAM ), which
since the 1990s has made obligatory the use of a standard format for
collecting information from travelers. This standard is the entry
and exit card or Tarjeta de Ingreso y Egreso (TIE), which is
applicable to all Central American countries. Article 31 of
Immigration Law 8487 (2005) establishes that each person intending
to enter or exit the country must present the card at the migration
entry point; Article 144 of this law stipulates that transportation
carriers must supply the card. Currently, Costa Rica uses APIS for
data collection from passengers arriving at the two principal
international airports of Juan Santamaria (in San Jose) and Daniel
Oduber (in Liberia). Costa Rican Immigration tracks travelers as
well as CR nationals.
-- Are there different policies for entry and exit at air, sea, and
land POEs and for domestic flights? No. The policies are standard
for all authorized migration entry ports, but as mentioned above,
the APIS system is only used in the two major international
airports. Also, at those two entry ports an "invisible migration
procedure" takes place for exiting passengers, because travelers do
not pass through the migration entry/exit point. Instead, the
airlines collect the exit cards and turn them over to CRI.
-- What agency oversees the collection of traveler information?
Costa Rica Immigration, which is part of the Ministry of Public
Security.
-- What are the policies of the collecting agency to share that
information with foreign governments? CRI's policy is to share
information, but there should be a cooperative agreement and the
sharing must not violate Costa Rican law; however, the GOCR does not
share information on refugees. Post has not encountered any
restrictions to sharing info with the USG; the Embassy consular
section routinely requests and receives Costa Rican Immigration
reports on cases of interest.
-- Does the host government collect Passenger Name Record (PNR) data
on incoming commercial flights or vessels? Yes, both upon entry and
departure. Is this data used for intelligence or law enforcement
purposes to screen travelers in a systematic way? Yes, alerts for
Immigration, Interpol, and Costa Rica's Judiciary are acted upon and
the data based queried. Does host government have any existing
treaties to share PNR data? Post is not aware of any official
treaties, but we have access to PNR data whenever necessary.
-- If applicable, have advance passenger information systems (APIS),
interactive advanced passenger information systems (IAPIS), or
electronic travel authority systems been effective at detecting
other national security threats, such as wanted criminals? CRI
reports that APIS has been effective in locating fugitives of all
types, including individuals in arrears on child support payments.
Post notes that corruption is problematic in CRI, but is current
director, Mario Zamora, has been effectively addressing this issue.
Reports have been received that some officials can be bribed to
overlook fugitive alerts particularly when offenders attempt to
leave Costa Rica.
5B. WATCHLISTING:
-- Is there a name-based watchlist system used to screen travelers
at POEs? Yes.
-- What domestic sources of information populate the name-based
watchlist, i.e. names of deported persons, terrorist lookouts,
criminal wants/warrants? The CR intelligence service (DIS) is the
main source of these kinds of watchlists. Post notes that CRI will
soon (estimated sometime this summer) implement a new immigration
tracking system, the Electronic Migratory Movement System (SIMMEL),
which during the second stage will be integrated with the existing
Integrated Immigration System and to INTERPOL. Deported persons,
terrorist lookouts and criminal warrants populate the watchlist.
-- If host government maintains a watchlist, how many records does
the watchlist contain, and how many are terrorist-related?
Impossible to determine.
-- Which ministry or office maintains the watchlist? CR
Immigration.
-- What international watchlists do the host government use for
screening individuals, e.g. Interpol or TSA No Fly lists, UN, etc.?
Interpol, once SIMMEL comes on line, see above.
-- What bilateral/multilateral watchlist agreements exist between
host government and its neighbors? None.
5C. BIOMETRICS:
-- Are biometric systems in place at ports of entry (air, land,
sea)? If no, does host government have plans to install such a
system? If biometric systems are available at some POEs, but not
all, how does the host government decide what POEs will receive the
tool? No, there are currently no biometric systems in place. The
Chief of Immigration, Mario Zamora, does have an aggressive plan to
upgrade all the immigration systems to incorporate biometrics data.
However, the resources to fund the system are not yet secured and
not all POEs would have access to the system if it were successfully
developed and deployed.
-- What biometric technologies, if any, does the host government
use, i.e. fingerprint identification, facial recognition, iris
recognition, hand geometry, retinal identification, DNA-based
identification, keystroke dynamics, gait analysis? Are the systems
ICAO compliant? None currently, although the GOCR plans to use a
combination of facial recognition and fingerprints with their new
system.
-- Are biometric systems integrated for all active POEs? What are
the systems and models used? Are all passengers screened for the
biometric or does the host government target a specific population
for collection (i.e. host country nationals)? Do the biometric
collection systems look for a one to one comparison (ensure the
biometric presented matches the one stored on the e-Passport) or one
to many comparisons (checking the biometric presented against a
database of known biometrics)? No.
-- If biometric systems are in place, does the host government know
of any countermeasures that have been used or attempted to defeat
biometric checkpoints? None in place.
-- What are the host government's policies on collecting the
fingerprints of travelers coming into the country? Currently the
GOCR does not collect fingerprints of visitors. The GOCR plans to
incorporate taking fingerprints if/when the new biometric system is
introduced.
-- Which agency is responsible for the host government's fingerprint
system? Multiple agencies share these responsibilities.
Fingerprints are maintainted by the Organismo de Investigaciones
Judiciales (OIJ-Costa Rican version of the FBI), the Ministry of
Public Security, and the Ministry of Justice (Prisons). In
mid-2009, as part of the Merida Initiative's Central American
Fingerprint Exchange (CAFE), an FBI fingerprint assessment team is
expected to review the three entities above and make formal
recommendations to the GOCR on how to logically integrate all three
systems.
-- Are the fingerprint programs in place NIST, INT-I, EFTS, UK1 or
RTID compliant? Not known.
-- Are the fingerprints collected as flats or rolled? Which agency
collects the fingerprints? N/A. See above on which agencies
collect fingerprints.
5D. BORDER CONTROL AND SCREENING:
-- Does the host government employ software to screen travelers of
security interest? No.
-- Are all travelers tracked electronically, or only non-host-
country nationals? All travelers are tracked electronically. What
is the frequency of travelers being "waived through" because they
hold up what appears to be an appropriate document, but whose
information is not actually recorded electronically? None. What is
the estimated percentage of non-recorded crossings, entries and
exits? Impossible to determine.
-- Do host government border control officials have the authority to
use other criminal data when making decisions on who can enter the
country? Yes. If so, please describe this authority (legislation,
mandates, etc). It is convoluted, but includes legislation and
executive mandates.
-- What are the host government's policies on questioning, detaining
and denying entry to individuals presenting themselves at a point of
entry into the country? They are able to question and detain if
necessary. Which agency would question, detain, or deny entry?
Costa Rican Intelligence Services (DIS) and CRI.
-- How well does information sharing function within the host
government, i.e., if there is a determination that someone with a
valid host-government visa is later identified with terrorism, how
is this communicated and resolved internally? It is resolved via
coordination between DIS and Immigration.
5E. PASSPORTS:
-- Does the host government issue a machine-readable passport
containing biometric information? No. If so, what biometric
information is included on the document, i.e. fingerprint, iris,
facial recognition, etc.? If not, does host government plan to
issue a biometric document in the future? Yes, fingerprints and
photos will be added as soon as the new system (SIMMEL) is
implemented. When? Unknown, but estimated for mid-2009.
-- If the host government issues a machine-readable passport
containing biometric information, does the host government share the
public key required to read the biometric information with any other
governments? N/A If so, which governments? Does the host
government issue replacement passports for full or limited validity
(i.e. the time remaining on the original passports, fixed validity
for a replacement,etc.)? Full validity replacements are issued.
-- Does the host government have special regulations/procedures for
dealing with "habitual" losers of passports or bearers who have
reported their passports stolen multiple times? CRI maintains a data
base for lost documents; reports of individuals suspected of
repeated abuse can be generated.
-- Are replacement passports of the same or different appearance and
page length as regular passports (do they have something along the
lines of our emergency partial duration passports)? If issued
in-country, they are the same as regular passports.
-- Do emergency replacement passports contain the same or fewer
biometric fields as regular-issue passports? Emergency passports
issued abroad contain fewer biometric fields than regular-issue
passports.
-- Where applicable, has Post noticed any increase in the number of
replacement or "clean" (i.e. no evidence of prior travel) passports
used to apply for U.S. visas? N/A.
-- Are replacement passports assigned a characteristic number series
or otherwise identified? Yes, they are assigned a specific book
number.
5F. FRAUD DETECTION:
-- How robust is fraud detection and how actively are instances of
fraud involving documents followed up? CRI resources are severely
limited and thus so are fraud detection efforts. We note an
aggressive approach at the main international airport in San Jose,
Juan Santamaria, with fraudulent document detection fairly frequent.
Outside the context of international air travel, fraud detection
efforts are not aggressive and the fabrication of fraudulent
documents is as common as is corruption in obtaining documents.
CR's Justice Department recently arrested a fraudulent document
manufacturer who was making and selling CR National ID cards; the
fraudulent cards were perfect because the machinery to produce them
as well as all of the supplies (paper, laminates, ink, etc.,) were
authentic and had been purchased from corrupt officials in the GOCR
offices that normally produce them.
-- How are potentially fraudulently issued documents taken out of
circulation, or made harder to use? Although there is no systematic
mechanism to take fraudulently issued documents out of circulation,
claims by CRI and the Ministry of Justice that efforts are underway
to tighten document security seem credible.
5G. PRIVACY AND DATA SECURITY:
-- What are the country's policies on records related to the
questioning, detention or removal of individuals encountered at
points of entry into the country? Post has been contacted to
participate in CRI investigations at the main international airport
in San Jose. Suspected offenders are detained and, if violations of
CR laws are evident, offenders are returned to their country of
origin. Records are maintained but not centrally; each office seems
to maintain its own set of records on detentions and interrogations.
How are those records stored, and for how long? Impossible to
determine.
-- What are the country's restrictions on the collection or use of
sensitive data? Laws are in place to protect privacy, however,
corruption is also a major problem. Post observes that possible
offenders are asked for any and all types of information and that
privacy waivers are not requested; there is a policy that a
Miranda-like warning be served though we have never observed this
service before any type of questioning.
-- What are the requirements to provide notice to the public on the
implementation of new databases of records? None that we are aware
of.
-- Are there any laws relating to security features for government
computer systems that hold personally identifying information? Yes.
CRI has free access to such information, however.
-- What are the rules on an individual's ability to access data that
homeland security agencies hold about them? Individuals regularly
try to obtain their records; this is an issue that is being debated
legally in Costga Rica.
-- Are there different rules for raw data (name, date of birth,
etc.) versus case files (for example, records about enforcement
actions)? No.
-- Does a non-citizen/resident have the right to sue the government
to obtain these types of data? Yes.
5H. (SBU) IDENTIFYING APPROPRIATE PARTNERS:
Department would appreciate post's in-house assessment of whether
host government would be an appropriate partner in data sharing.
Considerations include whether host government watchlists may
include political dissidents (as opposed or in addition to
terrorists), and whether host governments would share or use U.S.
watchlist data inappropriately, etc. Post assesses that GOCR would
be an appropriate partner in data sharing.
-- Is the host country's legal system sufficiently developed to
adequately provide safeguards for the protection and nondisclosure
of information? No.
-- How much information sharing does the host country do internally?
Is there a single consolidated database, for example? If not, do
different ministries share Information amongst themselves? There is
no single consolidated database, although one would make sense for a
small, but travel-dependent country like Costa Rica. There is
minimal internal GOCR sharing of information, and it is often
complicated by hyper-legalistic requirements.
-- How does the country define terrorism? Are there legal statutes
that do so? There is no simple definition of terrorism found in
Costa Rican law. However, an existing definition, found in CP
("Codigo Penal") 246 of Law 4573 (1970), was recently modified by
the passage of Law 8719 (2009) that strengthened counter terrorist
legislation including the financing of terrorism.
BRENNAN